Menifee Hit-and-Run Kills Teen Boy on Electric Motor Bike

Published: August 19, 2026
By: Yaghmai Law Firm, APC

(Menifee, CA) – A 15-year-old boy riding an electric motor bike died after a hit-and-run collision on the east side of Menifee, and police have since impounded an SUV connected to the case, authorities said Tuesday.

According to the Menifee Police Department, officers seized a white 2004 Toyota Sienna over the weekend, though no suspect has been taken into custody. Department spokesman Chase Coburn said the investigation remained active on Tuesday, with Traffic Unit detectives "pursuing all leads and exhausting all available resources to bring this case to a close." He did not say exactly where or how the van was found, and there was no indication whether investigators had moved closer to identifying who was driving.

The crash happened shortly after 8 p.m. last Wednesday near Briggs and Garbani roads. Police said the teenager was riding his eMoto, an off-road electrically powered motorcycle, in the southbound lanes of Briggs when he was hit. According to Coburn, "Witnesses reported seeing a vehicle traveling south on Briggs … while dragging (the eMoto) underneath its front end." Detectives said the electric bike eventually came loose from the SUV, and the person behind the wheel kept heading south without stopping.

The boy was located on Briggs just north of Garbani with a serious head injury, according to police. Riverside County Fire Department paramedics declared him dead at the scene a short time later. His identity has not been publicly released. Police asked anyone with information to reach the department's Traffic Unit.

Analysis of the Menifee Hit-and-Run Collision

When a driver leaves the scene of a crash that injures or kills someone, California law imposes clear duties. Vehicle Code section 20001 requires a driver involved in a collision resulting in injury or death to stop immediately and remain at the scene, and Vehicle Code section 20003 requires that driver to exchange identifying information and render reasonable assistance to anyone hurt. A departure from those obligations is what investigators would typically examine here, though the facts remain under review and no findings of responsibility have been announced.

Separate from any criminal process, a civil analysis would begin with California's general negligence rule. Civil Code section 1714(a) provides that a person is responsible for injury caused to another by a lack of ordinary care. If evidence eventually established that a driver operated a vehicle without reasonable care under the circumstances, that framework could apply. Investigators often also consider the Basic Speed Law, Vehicle Code section 22350, which bars driving faster than is reasonable and prudent for the conditions; whether it has any bearing here would depend entirely on physical evidence and witness accounts that have not been made public.

Where a fatal collision involves conduct that may go beyond ordinary carelessness, prosecutors sometimes look to Penal Code section 192(c), which defines vehicular manslaughter. Any such determination rests with law enforcement and the courts, not with early reporting, and nothing here should be read as a conclusion about fault.

Because the death arose from a crash, California's wrongful-death and survival statutes may be relevant to the family. Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60 identifies who may bring a wrongful-death action, generally close surviving relatives, while section 377.30 governs a survival claim brought through the decedent's personal representative or successor in interest. The measure of any recoverable damages would be guided by Civil Code section 3333, and most personal-injury claims are subject to the two-year deadline in Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1.

What Families and Riders Can Do

After a hit-and-run that takes a loved one, families can request the official collision report, preserve any surviving physical evidence and witness contacts, and keep records of medical and funeral expenses. Because the driver in an unidentified hit-and-run may never be located, it is also worth reviewing whether uninsured-motorist coverage under Insurance Code section 11580.2 could apply, since that coverage can reach injuries caused by an unidentified or fleeing driver. Deadlines such as the two-year limitations period can pass quickly while an investigation is still open, so speaking with a lawyer early helps protect a family's options. Were you, or someone you love, involved in this crash? A Menifee Car Accident Lawyer at Yaghmai Law Firm can explain your options and deal with the insurance companies for you. Call or text (888) 800-6731 or request a free case review.

FREE CASE REVIEW →

About the Author

Houtan Yaghmai, Esq., President & Managing Attorney of Yaghmai Law Firm, APC. California State Bar No. 298487. Speaks English, French, and Persian. The firm represents personal injury clients throughout Southern California – consultations by phone, text, or video, no office visits required.

This post was assembled with AI assistance from publicly reported news sources cited below. All California Vehicle Code references were verified against leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Facts were re-checked via additional web searches before publication. This post is based on initial news reports and may be updated as new facts develop. Nothing in this article is legal advice. Yaghmai Law Firm, APC is not associated with the investigating agencies and does not represent any party named in this post unless explicitly stated.

Sources:
1. GNEWS_CA_HITRUN – Vehicle Seized In Menifee Hit-And-Run That Killed Teen Boy: https://patch.com/california/murrieta/vehicle-seized-menifee-hit-run-killed-teen-boy