Nine Injured in San Francisco Crash During Police Pursuit

Published: July 20, 2026
By: Yaghmai Law Firm, APC

(San Francisco, CA) – Nine people were hurt when a pickup truck fleeing police collided with another vehicle Sunday evening near South Van Ness Avenue and 14th Street, according to authorities.

The crash occurred shortly after 8 p.m. as officers were following a pickup truck that later struck a second vehicle, the San Francisco Police Department said. According to police, officers first noticed the truck being driven erratically near Guerrero and 19th streets. When they tried to pull it over, the department said the truck did not stop and kept going.

The pursuit ended near 14th and South Van Ness Avenue, where police said the truck hit another occupied car, which then struck a fire hydrant and a car dealership. Officers detained the driver and four other people who had been inside the truck as part of the investigation, according to the department.

The San Francisco Fire Department reported that nine people across the two vehicles were injured. Police said five people had been in the pickup truck and four were in the car that was hit. Two people were listed in critical condition, six had minor to moderate injuries, and one person declined transport to a hospital after being evaluated. The SFPD also said one of its patrol cars was nearly struck during the pursuit. Police said the identities of the suspects were not being released and that charges were still pending.

Analysis of the San Francisco Pursuit Collision

Crashes that occur during police pursuits raise questions that investigators and, later, civil attorneys typically work to answer through the collision report, video, and witness accounts. Under California Civil Code section 1714(a), every person has a duty to use ordinary care to avoid injuring others, and a driver who breaches that duty may be liable for the resulting harm. When a fleeing motorist is involved, investigators often examine whether the driving amounted to willful or wanton disregard for public safety, conduct addressed by Vehicle Code sections 2800.1 and 2800.2, which govern evading a peace officer. Any criminal charging decision, however, rests with prosecutors and is separate from questions of civil responsibility.

Speed and the manner of driving are also commonly reviewed. Vehicle Code section 22350, the Basic Speed Law, requires that a driver travel no faster than is reasonable and prudent for the conditions. If evidence were to show a statutory violation that proximately caused injuries of the kind a statute was meant to prevent, Evidence Code section 669 can create a presumption of negligence for the class of people the law protects. Whether that framework applies here would depend entirely on facts developed during the investigation.

Pursuit cases can also involve the conduct of the agency itself. California grants emergency-vehicle drivers certain exemptions under Vehicle Code section 21055, but section 21056 makes clear those exemptions do not relieve an officer of the duty to drive with due regard for everyone on the road. Separately, Vehicle Code section 17004.7 can provide public agencies immunity from liability for injuries caused by a fleeing suspect when the agency maintains and trains on a compliant written pursuit policy. Because these issues turn on documentation and training records, they are typically evaluated carefully before any conclusion is reached. Under Civil Code section 1431.2, non-economic damages would be allocated in proportion to each party's share of fault, and Civil Code section 3333 sets the measure of compensable harm.

What Injured People and Families Can Do

People hurt in a multi-vehicle pursuit crash can take practical steps to protect their health and any potential claim: obtain a copy of the police collision report, seek prompt medical evaluation and follow-up even for injuries that seem minor, and preserve evidence such as photographs and the contact information of witnesses. California law imposes deadlines that can be short – generally two years for personal injury claims under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1, and as little as six months to present a written claim against a public entity under Government Code section 911.2, a prerequisite to suit under Government Code section 945.4. Drivers involved also have reporting obligations under Vehicle Code sections 16000 and 20008. Because a police-pursuit crash can involve both private drivers and a government agency, the analysis is fact-specific; anyone with questions about their rights can Were you, or someone you love, involved in this crash? A California truck accident lawyer at Yaghmai Law Firm can explain your options and deal with the insurance companies for you. Call or text (888) 800-6731 or request a free case review.

FREE CASE REVIEW →

.

About the Author

Houtan Yaghmai, Esq., President & Managing Attorney of Yaghmai Law Firm, APC. California State Bar No. 298487. Speaks English, French, and Persian. The firm represents personal injury clients throughout Southern California – consultations by phone, text, or video, no office visits required.

This post was assembled with AI assistance from publicly reported news sources cited below. All California Vehicle Code references were verified against leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Facts were re-checked via additional web searches before publication. This post is based on initial news reports and may be updated as new facts develop. Nothing in this article is legal advice. Yaghmai Law Firm, APC is not associated with the investigating agencies and does not represent any party named in this post unless explicitly stated.

Sources:
1. GNEWS_CA_COLLISION – Multiple injured in San Francisco after truck crashes into car during police pursuit at S. Van Ness Avenue and 14th Street: https://abc7news.com/post/multiple-injured-san-francisco-car-collides-another-during-police-pursuit-van-ness-avenue-14th-street/19541388/